------------------
          The Gospel Observer
    "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations...teaching them
    to observe all that I commanded you, and lo, I am with you always,
    even to the end of the age" (Matt. 28:19,20).
    --------------------
    October 26, 2014
    --------------------
    
    Contents: 
    
    1) Do They Give Us A Clue? (Harry Osborne) 
    2) Change (Greg Gwin) 
    3) News & Notes 
    --------------------
    
    -1- 
    
    Do They Give Us A Clue 
    by Harry Osborne 
    
    The biblical account of creation is initially set forth in simple
    narrative form in Genesis 1-2. The account shows every sign of being
    an historical narrative to be understood in its literal and obvious
    sense. Dealing fairly with the text itself demands one acknowledge
    that the first readers would have concluded a simple truth: God
    created the world and all things in it, including man, over a period
    of six literal, consecutive days at the beginning of time. However,
    this article will seek to address the view of the creation presented
    in other passages of Scripture as the inspired writers look back on
    the Genesis account of creation. In this way, we can see the divine
    commentary given to us to aid in properly interpreting this
    important and fundamental text.  
    
    Genesis 5:1-3 
    
    This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God
    created man, in the likeness of God made He him; male and female
    created He them, and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in
    the day when they were created. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty
    years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and
    called his name Seth..." (ASV).  
    
    The fact that Adam and Eve were created on the same day is here
    affirmed. Two measures of time, a day and years, are used in the
    same context. Consistency demands the same rule apply to
    interpreting both. Was the day actually a long epoch or a literal
    day? Were the years a period of approximately 365 literal days or a
    collection of many epochs? Obviously, the literal sense of both
    "day" and "years" best fits the context.  
    
    Exodus 20:9-11; 31:14-17 
    
    Each passage views the six days of creation and following day of
    rest as analogous to the Jews' six days of work and following day of
    rest, the Sabbath. The days are analogous in length, order, and
    function. If they are not meant to suggest such likeness, there
    would appear no legitimate purpose for the parallel made between
    them.  
    
    Psalm 33:6-9 
    
    By the word of Jehovah were the heavens made, and all the host of
    them by the breath of His mouth. He gathereth the waters of the sea
    together as a heap: He layeth up the deeps in store-houses. Let all
    the earth fear Jehovah: let all the inhabitants of the world stand
    in awe of Him. For He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it
    stood fast (ASV).  
    
    God's power as manifest in creation is the focus of this passage.
    When God spoke, it was done and stood fast. How could this passage
    be harmonized with an interpretation of the creation account which
    holds that God spoke to begin a process that took millions or
    billions of years to "stabilize" into the form ultimately reached?
    There is no way to harmonize the two for Psalm 33 is diametrically
    opposed to such views. Yet, our progressive creationists tell us
    that when God spoke into existence the heavens and the earth, he
    actually caused the big bang to take place 15 to 20 billion years
    ago which finally resulted in the earth forming some 4.5 billion
    years ago. They tell us that when God spoke light into existence on
    a first day, it took millions of years for enough cooling and
    clearing of the atmosphere to take place so that the sun, moon and
    stars could be seen to have already been made when he spoke to make
    them on a fourth day. Such interpretations may sprout from a fertile
    imagination, but they wither away when examined in the light of the
    plain teaching of Psalm 33.  
    
    Mark 10:6 and Matthew 19:4-6 
    
    In answering a question asked by the Pharisees about divorce, Jesus
    referred them back to the origin of marriage with Adam and Eve.
    Jesus affirmed, "He which made them at the beginning made them male
    and female" (Matt. 19:4, KJV). The progressive creationist might
    respond that this refers to the beginning of marriage which may have
    come millions or billions of years after the beginning of creation.
    However, the parallel account of Mark 10:6 takes care of that
    quibble by saying, "But from the beginning of the creation God made
    them male and female." If the progressive creationists are correct,
    man and woman were brought on the scene much closer to our end of
    time than the beginning. Again, the interpretation forced on the
    Bible by Progressive Creationism does not harmonize with other
    biblical references back to creation. Bert Thompson made the
    following point in commenting on the same passage: 
    
    "In this context, there is additional information that should be
    considered as well. For example, concerning Adam and Eve, Jesus
    declared: 'But from the beginning of the creation, Male and female
    made he them' (Mark 10:6; cf. Matthew 19:4). Christ thus dates the
    first humans from the creation week. The Greek word for 'beginning'
    is arche, and is used of 'absolute, denoting the beginning of the
    world and of its history, the beginning of creation.' The word in
    the Greek for 'creation' is ktiseos, and denotes 'the sum-total of
    what God has created' (Cremer, Biblico-Theological Dictionary of New
    Testament Greek, 1962, 113, 114, 381, emp. in orig.).
    Unquestionably, then, Jesus placed the first humans at the dawn of
    creation. To reject this truth, one must contend that: (a) Christ
    knew the Universe was in existence billions of years before man,
    but, accommodating Himself to the ignorance of His age, deliberately
    misrepresented the situation; or (b) The Lord, living in
    pre-scientific times, was uninformed about the matter (despite the
    fact that He was there as Creator -- Colossians 1:16). Either of
    these allegations is blasphemous" (Thompson, Creation Compromises
    1995, 179).  
    
    Other passages could be addressed regarding the issue as well.
    However, these are sufficient to show that the biblical writers
    looking back on the creation account took it as a literal statement
    that God created heaven, earth and all therein in six literal,
    consecutive days with man's creation taking place in that beginning
    of the creation week. Any conclusion to the contrary needs to deal
    with these passages as well as Genesis 1 and 2 in order to show from
    the contexts that such a conclusion is sustained by proper exegesis.
     
    
    -- Via Truth Magazine, October 21, 1999, Volume XLIII, No. 20 
    --------------------
    
    -2- 
    
    Change 
    by Greg Gwin 
    
    We hear a lot about 'change.'  Politicians frequently talk
    about changing things in government.  Educators discuss
    changing our schools.  Societal trends and technological
    advances have powerfully changed things in our daily lives.  We
    now hear of 'personal trainers' who try to help people modify their
    living habits and routines.  So, with all this talk about
    'change,' what about 'change' when it comes to religious matters?
    
    First, we should observe that some things should not be
    changed.  God has clearly revealed His will for our lives in
    the inspired Word.  What He has taught us -- the things the
    Scriptures command and authorize (Colossians 3:17) -- should NOT be
    altered (Revelation 22:18).  Men have imagined that they can
    change such things, and they have proceeded to do so with
    abandon.  At their whim, via a 'church council,' or by a human
    vote, they make revisions to the 'perfect law of liberty' (James
    1:25).  Do they really think that they can improve on God's
    plan?  Apparently so!  This is wrong, and these 'changes'
    must be avoided.
    
    Second, some things absolutely should be changed.  Here we have
    in mind any sinful things that exist in our personal lives or in our
    collective endeavors.  It is never too soon to rid ourselves of
    evil.  John the Baptist urged his hearers to 'bring forth
    therefore fruits worthy of repentance' (Luke 3:8).  We should
    do the same, and we ought to do it NOW.  Such change is not
    only good, it is commanded and necessary.
    
    Finally, some change is neither inherently good nor bad.  Some
    things are judgment matters.  When this is the case, we can be
    flexible.  We should 'be subject one to another, and be clothed
    with humility' (1 Peter 5:5).  It does not have to be 'my
    way.'  I can and should yield to others.  This type of
    change may help to advance the kingdom and do much good.  In
    such cases we must be careful about stubbornly resisting 'change.' 
    
    -- Via The Beacon, September 16, 2014 
    --------------------
    
    "Our LORD and our God, you are my mighty rock, my fortress, my
    protector. You are the rock where I am safe. You are my shield, my
    powerful weapon, and my place of shelter. You rescue me and keep me
    from being hurt. I praise you, our LORD! I prayed to you, and you
    rescued me from my enemies" (2 Sam. 22:2-4, Contemporary English
    Version). 
    --------------------
    
    -3- 
    
    News & Notes 
    
    Let us who are Christians be mindful of the following when we go to
    our Father in prayer:
    
    Virginia Fontenot has now been on hospice care for a few
    weeks. Her appetite has been poor, and she is in pain every
    day.  Please also remember her daughter (Linda Blevins) who has
    been with her mother 24 hours a day, having taken an early
    retirement from the medical field (about a year and a half ago) to
    be able to help her mother.
    
    Steve Wolfgang writes concerning his wife: "Bette and
    I are humbly grateful for all the prayers and expressions of concern
    from SO MANY of you, as well as those expressed in other ways. She
    is resting at home and recovering well. The bruising from the
    surgery (incision, IVs, blood draws, etc.) caused by the
    industrial-strength blood thinners are healing, and she is
    recovering strength day by day. She was able to attend one night of
    our meeting, and hopes to do so tonight. Thanks again to one and
    all!" 
    
    Let us also continue to include on our prayer list the following for
    their health: Marie Turner, Myrna Jordan, Jim Lively,
      Danielle Howard, Ronnie Davis, Rex and Frankie Hadley, Jewel
      Wilson, Mary Vandevander, Deborah Medlock, Shirley Davis, Sue
      Wooten, Dexter Roberts, and Colleen Henson. 
    --------------------
    
    The Steps That Lead to Eternal Salvation
    
    1) Hear the gospel, for that is how faith comes (Rom.
    10:17; John 20:30,31).
    2) Believe in the deity of Christ (John 8:24; John
    3:18).
    3) Repent of sins (Luke 13:5; Acts 17:30).
    4) Confess faith in Christ (Rom. 10:9,10; Acts
    8:36-38).
    5) Be baptized in water for the remission of sins
    (Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38; 22:16; Rom. 6:3,4; Gal. 3:26,27; 1 Pet.
    3:21)      
    6) Continue in the faith; for, if not, salvation can
    be lost (Heb. 10:36-39; Rev. 2:10; 2 Pet. 2:20-22).
    --------------------
    
      Tebeau Street
    CHURCH OF CHRIST
    1402 Tebeau Street, Waycross, GA  31501
    Sunday services: 9:00 AM (Bible class); 10 AM & 5 PM (worship)
    Wednesday: 7 PM (Bible class)
    evangelist/editor: Tom Edwards (912) 614-8593
    Tom@ThomasTEdwards.com
    http://ThomasTEdwards.com/go
    (Gospel Observer website)
    http://ThomasTEdwards.com/audioser.html
    (audio sermons)